MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7865
MotherboardMSI AM1I (MS-7865)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 61.8
32% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 126
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 7.59
5% 6.85 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 333 347 373 380 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 427
Write 354
Mixed 342
SusWrite 346
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 21.6
85% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 47.9
75% 141 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
615GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Read 11.1
Write 8
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 29.2
22% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1I (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback