Gigabyte GA-EP43-S3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP43-S3L  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 16:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5472
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 94.7
46% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 186
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23
Parallax 17.9
16% 20.3 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 21.4
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 182 187 184 195 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.8% Very good
Read 262
Write 253
Mixed 203
SusWrite 190
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 39.7
134% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 193
148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 8 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: 7500A50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 63 64 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 66
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 62.3
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP43-S3L Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43-S3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback