Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 06:18
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 244
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 773
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 78.5
64% 79.8 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 78.9
62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 256 262 266 265 267 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 430
Mixed 426
SusWrite 273
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 47.2
153% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 204
184% 279 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
541GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 133 142 141 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 166
Write 122
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 139
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 113%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
641GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 126
Write 131
Mixed 103
SusWrite 108
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 85%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
89GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 50.8
Write 50.8
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 52
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 124 128 124 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 135
Write 122
Mixed 70
SusWrite 127
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 101%
NORELSYS 1081 134GB
29GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.24% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 12
Mixed 9
SusWrite 10.3
15% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 39.1
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 104%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback