TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive400% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 02:29
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
103% 187 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,020
100% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3715)
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4125 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 251
Parallax 272
209% 260 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 252
Splatting 156
187% 240 fps
Poor: 128% ↑
This bench: 181%
 Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2176 2151 2180 2206 1498 1784 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,869
Write 2,223
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 1,999
480% 2,145 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 91.3
324% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,439
1,079% 1,436 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑
This bench: 400%
 Great: 393%
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB
319GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1852 864 598 601 597 597 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,068
Write 1,802
Mixed 820
SusWrite 852
308% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 66.2
267% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 1,370
DQ Mixed 911
768% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 170% ↑
This bench: 269%
 Great: 276%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
407GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 493 493 494 494 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 492
Mixed 456
SusWrite 493
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.9
214% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 32.7
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 34.2
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 46.1
87% 46.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 143%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples4,845x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples1,068x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples482x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples1,384x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples823x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples404x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples358x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples302x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples286x
RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples410x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples335x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples269x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback