PC Intel X299

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC Intel X299  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING
Memory41 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 21:00
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9920X-$587
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 1,017
86% 742 Pts
64-Core 2,072
128% 2,072 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 203
Parallax 226
155% 206 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 196
Splatting 135
152% 193 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 143%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,324
Write 900
Mixed 841
226% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 73.9
269% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 214
255% 429 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Adata SU630 480GB
234GB free
Firmware: V8X01c86
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 363 370 372 372 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 371
Write 356
Mixed 320
SusWrite 370
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 28.8
107% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 193
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
707GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 188 188 190 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 182
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 189
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C15K4 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CM4X16GC3000C15K4 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 29.8
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X299 Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: PC Intel X299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback