Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 89 1-Core 94 2-Core 173 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 522 47% 396 Pts	64-Core 882 55% 882 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0312C0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 216 158 82 57 220 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 1,315 Write 218 Mixed 833 SusWrite 186 140% 638 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 23.3 129% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 486 DQ Write 506 DQ Mixed 397 326% 463 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 234%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 35GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 91 89 91 91 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 462 Write 441 Mixed 337 SusWrite 117 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 23.1 77% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 174 178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB 1,639 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 33.5 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	145x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	113x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	93x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	191x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	82x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16