Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FL
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '20 at 12:11
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 189 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 523 55% 443 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250 8,806 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 11BF) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4187 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 20 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 19.4 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 22.3 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 92 56 107 56 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,283 Write 846 Mixed 792 SusWrite 103 168% 756 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 64.9 187% 69 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 726 DQ Mixed 216 254% 425 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 2,923 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	61.5% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 22.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	33x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	32x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	46x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	22x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	15x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	29x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	10x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 486 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16