Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 01:21
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
89% 188 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 729
74% 584 Pts
64-Core 856
58% 856 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$330
EVGA(3842 2067) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Lighting 347
Reflection 300
Parallax 348
91% 332 fps
MRender 287
Gravity 298
Splatting 191
87% 259 fps
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 91%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$272
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 385 433 439 439 435 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 424
Mixed 324
SusWrite 419
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 37.5
135% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 196
140% 179 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 133%
Toshiba HG6 128GB
21GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 468
Write 407
Mixed 407
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 27.9
85% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 108
79% 106 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 103%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$74
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 151
Write 144
Mixed 95
SusWrite 137
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$50
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 1.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 1
SusWrite 34
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$84
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $859
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $84SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback