Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3500M APU-$60 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 61.7 36% 53.3 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 100 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20) 15 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0600) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.07 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 167 175 166 176 173 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.5% Average	Read 223 Write 200 Mixed 186 SusWrite 175 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 16.7 56% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 111 87% 119 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSA8GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 9.6 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 71%, 6,527 samples	2x
Savage 240GBHyperX $117Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	5x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	4x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 6GBUnknownBench 24%, 137 samples	3x