Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 15:02
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 174
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 510
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 146
Parallax 123
108% 134 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 130
Splatting 109
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 46 45 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 307
Write 178
Mixed 188
SusWrite 49
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 27.3
90% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 38.7
32% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
163GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 113 114 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 296
Write 194
Mixed 169
SusWrite 112
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 25.8
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 63.2
DQ Mixed 33.6
29% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 114%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
242GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 172 170 138 173 173 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 191
Write 220
Mixed 182
SusWrite 166
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 26.3
87% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 37
33% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 107%
Adaptec Array 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 440 438 458 451 451 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
Read 582
Write 516
Mixed 280
SusWrite 447
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 2
25% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 10.2
11% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback