Intel Emerald Lake

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIntel HuronRiver Platform
MotherboardIntel Emerald Lake  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 17:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 110
53% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 142
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0506) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.31
2% 2.09 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 55 62 55 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 66
Write 60.4
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 59.2
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Emerald Lake Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel Emerald Lake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback