Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 02:34
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 57.4
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 184
61% 112 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 708
64% 536 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 67.2
64% 74.7 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 75.1
60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT24L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 106 105 97 90 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 455
Mixed 312
SusWrite 106
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 51.5
178% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 273
202% 264 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 104%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
300GB free
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 218 214 155 218 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,411
Write 1,186
Mixed 921
SusWrite 210
207% 932 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 36
186% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 465
425% 648 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 157%
Great: 248%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB
87GB free
Firmware: SD23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 83 82 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 77.3
Write 26
Mixed 43
SusWrite 83.2
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 59 57 58 55 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 52.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 54.7
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
454GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 107 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 106
65% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 131 133 133 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 72.2
Write 124
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 132
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 63%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 160 155 164 154 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 173
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 161
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
283% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 123 122 127 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 112
Write 130
Mixed 72
SusWrite 126
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
324% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
298GB free
Firmware: ES2OA70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 80 79 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 80.5
Write 81
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 80.3
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 121 121 121 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 105
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 122
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-20-20 D4-3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 23
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback