HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '17 at 23:57
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 492
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.95
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 18.9
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 16.9
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 512
Write 494
Mixed 511
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 13.1
77% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 54.8
DQ Mixed 11.1
16% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
360GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 141
Mixed 136
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.23
126% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C-RD Elpida EBJ20EF8BDWA-GN-F Elpida EBJ20EF8BDWA-GN-F HMT451U7AFR8C-RD 12GB
1866, 1600, 1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback