HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	40.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '20 at 23:29
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 191 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 326 41% 311 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 412.16 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Lighting 54.6 Reflection 55.8 Parallax 55.1 44% 55.2 fps	MRender 51.8 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 58.3 45% 54.1 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: LB3i SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 175 179 157 166 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 332 Write 191 Mixed 212 SusWrite 170 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 29.5 123% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 219 172% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 88%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 747GB free Firmware: JA0OA7G0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 83 87 83 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49% Average	Read 86.8 Write 82.5 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 84 53% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB 1,430 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	967x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	401x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	381x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16