Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190321
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 17:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 165
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 375
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A2E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4120
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 5.69
4% 6.33 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.8
7% 7.84 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 220 204 220 218 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 432
Write 512
Mixed 449
SusWrite 247
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 25
74% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 421
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 329
266% 376 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 112%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
855GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 110 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 124
Write 108
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 110
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback