Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 (all builds)
Memory	30.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110223
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '17 at 20:41
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 57.7 2-Core 180 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 354 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz) 8,807 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(105B 0DCC) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.83 2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 346GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 20061 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 402 (B1) Unknown 97 97 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 52 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 20 (EB) Unknown 99 99 325 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38913813526	82% Excellent	Read 499 Write 342 Mixed 359 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 22.9 108% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 67.8 88% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 126%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 65GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 14 (03) Spinup time 195 134 7233 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4847 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 42 42 42384 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1047 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 539 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 344871 (C2) HDA temperature 120 95 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9 (C8) Write error rate 200 167 0	57.9% Above average	Read 106 Write 95.5 Mixed 101 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.27 102% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 55%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 52GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 59617264 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 332 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15860230 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16386 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 310 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 97 97 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 12885299637 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 72 54 504823836 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 228 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 34787 (C2) HDA temperature 28 46 68719476764 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 187 10231 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 72975789336769 (F1) Unknown 100 253 88972181163 (F2) Unknown 100 253 19069688102	73.2% Very good	Read 145 Write 110 Mixed 119 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.16 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	22x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	16x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	3x
JM1333KLU-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 308 samples	2x
VS2GB1333D4 4x2GBCorsairBench 47%, 334 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16