Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 11:05
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 241
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 734
69% 572 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 112
Parallax 105
89% 109 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 92.5
78% 95.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 227 245 272 269 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 464
Mixed 395
SusWrite 276
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 47.2
155% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 215
168% 240 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 134%
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
27GB free
Firmware: N1209B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 76 73 76 57 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48% Average
Read 458
Write 361
Mixed 294
SusWrite 97.6
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 8.5
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 94.2
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 12.1
30% 63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48%
Great: 85%
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
76GB free
Firmware: N1209B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 334 356 182 113 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 477
Write 299
Mixed 272
SusWrite 234
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 7.5
69% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 13.9
29% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96
864GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1812 1841 1691 1470 1489 1483 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 1,908
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 1,631
436% 1,947 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 57.1
199% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 73
DQ Mixed 141
196% 387 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 283%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
138GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 121 121 118 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 96.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 119
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D32AET4K.M8FE 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 40.6
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 23.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback