Clevo B5100M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo B5100M  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO B5100M
Memory2.6 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '17 at 08:30
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
U28, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 99.9
49% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 138
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Clevo(1558 4101) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2125
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 0.94
1% 2.15 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple TS256C 251GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJAA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 185
Write 120
Mixed 135
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 11.6
52% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 7.94
19% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B2873FHS-CH9 5GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.4
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback