PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
Memory | 58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140325 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 09 '20 at 12:30 |
Run Duration | 105 Seconds |
Run User | NZL-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 333.11
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HUC106060CSS600 600GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 51 22 32 49 73 MB/s
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 146x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 114x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |