HP xw9400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP xw9400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A1Ch
Memory5.8 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 21:09
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2354
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 56.8
28% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 255
22% 186 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 5215) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.23
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.49 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 87 87 89 81 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.5% Poor
Read 112
Write 86.2
Mixed 96.4
SusWrite 85.1
21% 95 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 15
54% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 52.8
DQ Write 42.9
DQ Mixed 47.9
36% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 5
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw9400 Workstation Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP xw9400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback