HP EliteBook 840 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 20:44
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 121
46% 81 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 132
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4600
HP(103C 198F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 5.59
3% 4.82 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.83
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 128GB 128GB
109GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 374 375 375 379 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 330
Write 297
Mixed 253
SusWrite 374
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 12.4
63% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.4
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 28.2
66% 131 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0007DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 74 91 96 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 63.8
Write 73
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 85.6
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G1 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback