PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q SE2 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100331 |
Uptime | 32.5 Days |
Run Date | Feb 08 '20 at 13:09 |
Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 43 44 45 40 46 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
28GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 48 43 39 46 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
59GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 81 80 81 MB/s
|
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
85GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.5 MB/s
|
4.82%
Terrible
|
|||
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
15GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
18%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 16x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 16x |
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples | 12x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $195 |