Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.05%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '17 at 12:03
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 145-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Memory 7.95
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 14.4
7% 11.3 Pts
4-Core 23.7
8-Core 27
3% 25.4 Pts
64-Core 32.7
2% 32.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 44%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 262
Write 236
Mixed 249
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 14.5
72% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 14.8
19% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1866G 2OZ DDR3 1866G 2OZ Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 423
10% 423 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback