Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '20 at 10:11
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$51 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 203 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 326 41% 313 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1402) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.54 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 30.4 28% 33 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 31.3 Splatting 31.9 27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 169 179 164 153 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 432 Write 400 Mixed 324 SusWrite 167 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 44.9 172% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 61.2 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 117 113% 169 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 124%
WD WD5000AZRX-00A8L 500GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 191GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 91 91 98 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 88.3 Write 93.1 Mixed 39.6 SusWrite 93.7 57% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB 7,803 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 25.2 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22.8 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $74Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	177x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	147x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	99x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	92x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	19x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16