EVGA 152-HR-E979

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardEVGA 152-HR-E979  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140430
Uptime13.7 Days
Run DateJan 01 '17 at 07:39
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 629
67% 533 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2680) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.9
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 501
Write 357
Mixed 427
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 31.1
114% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 71.5
112% 211 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
84GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 75.9
Write 73.5
Mixed 63.7
53% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB
4GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Read 9.89
Write 10.6
Mixed 10.3
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.78
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.09
28% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 152-HR-E979 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 152-HR-E979

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback