Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21% Poor	Memory 22.1 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 35.8 16% 26.5 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 144 16% 127 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.94 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M6M 256GB 264 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 237 156 220 238 185 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 290 Write 137 Mixed 209 SusWrite 220 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 15.6 50% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 134 103% 141 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 305 13% 305 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16