Default EP01

Performance Results

Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 22%
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemDefault EP01  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 16:03
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 22.1
1-Core 20.1
2-Core 45.3
17% 29.2 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 172
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 4.8
2% 5.63 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.5
1% 5.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M6M 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 237 156 220 238 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 290
Write 137
Mixed 209
SusWrite 220
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 15.6
50% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 134
103% 141 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 305
13% 305 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EP01 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation 17%

System: Default EP01

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $344Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback