Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 12:47
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 116
56% 89 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 419
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3753) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 113
Parallax 107
91% 111 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 100
Splatting 101
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS330 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP022PD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 320 415 431 428 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 451
Write 379
Mixed 312
SusWrite 382
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 26.7
92% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 158
143% 217 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81%
Great: 96%
Samsung 830 64GB
31GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 150 146 148 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 417
Write 114
Mixed 128
SusWrite 146
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 20
67% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 86.5
75% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
345GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 75.1
103% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback