MSI MS-16H5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GS60 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16H5  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 506
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 6.41
3% 17.5 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.61
5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 SATA M.2 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUXA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 135 293 210 314 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 303
Write 160
Mixed 296
SusWrite 236
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 35.3
104% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 225
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
548GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 124
Write 130
Mixed 26
SusWrite 117
72% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16H5 Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16H5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback