Teclast F15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemTeclast F15  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F15
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181213
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 19:53
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 35.6
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 100
35% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 199
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 2.34
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 5.96
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NA950-2280 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 55 46 92 46 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 400
Write 348
Mixed 299
SusWrite 102
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 9.7
62% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 23.7
66% 135 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F15 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Teclast F15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback