ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151027
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '16 at 06:35
Run Duration	90 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y71 3,052 User benchmarks, average bench 45% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 164 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 184 27% 197 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 066B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 5.09 4% 5.12 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 3.67 Splatting 8 5% 6.05 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT500MX200SSD6 500GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 188 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5572 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 28 309239087142 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2190747851 (F7) Unknown 100 100 68496987 (F8) Unknown 100 100 46345609	65.6% Good	Read 491 Write 387 Mixed 390 94% 423 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 13.3 70% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 44.7 DQ Mixed 13.6 16% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 808080808080808080808080808080808080 2x4GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Venue 11 Pro 7140 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140

CPU
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	45x
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	32x
Core M-5Y10IntelBench 47%, 478 samples	9x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	86x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 72%, 1,324 samples	26x
LJH-128V2G-11 M.2 2260 128GBLiteonBench 57%, 138 samples	19x
LJH-256V2G-11 M.2 2260 256GBLiteonBench 70%, 129 samples	14x

RAM
A0B4CDD4C6B2B5B6B6B4C8DAADB1C7B6C5B1 2x2GBMicronBench 44%, 138 samples	20x
C8CDD4B4B2B5D3B6C1C6D2B6C1ADD0C2A0A0 2x2GBHynixBench 44%, 162 samples	17x
808080808080808080808080808080808080 2x4GBHynixBench 44%, 118 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback