Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '15 at 21:19
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65
2-Core 123
43% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 312
33% 265 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3107) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 19.1
18% 18.9 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 19.6
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 145
Write 121
Mixed 126
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.22
75% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 114%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
8GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 12.3
Mixed 9.6
18% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.39
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.22
28% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 25%
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback