Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 16:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 138
60% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 424
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 30.6
21% 28 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 32.6
22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 86 44 126 110 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 426
Write 298
Mixed 284
SusWrite 118
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 17.1
65% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 40.4
46% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
283GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 265 265 263 264 265 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 437
Mixed 367
SusWrite 282
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 41.7
144% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 242
186% 253 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 108 108 105 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 85
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 106
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.4
188% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter Kingston 99U5403-124.A00LF 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback