Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 11:35
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 920
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 1165 1147 1081 1088 1044 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,943
Write 1,361
Mixed 779
SusWrite 1,111
289% 1,299 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 52.7
181% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 420
326% 453 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 223%
Great: 283%
Intel SSDPEDMW012T4 1TB
339GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 1173 1149 1158 1148 1161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1026
Write 1,217
Mixed 739
SusWrite 1,155
234% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 39.5
157% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 483
363% 489 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 181%
Great: 250%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
948GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 506 508 507 508 507 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 57.6
MC Mixed 52.4
165% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 28.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 147%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback