Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar NF520D3

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar NF520D3 (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '20 at 07:52
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 460-$150 1,087 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 49.8 2-Core 84.8 46% 69.8 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 136 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% XFX(1682 3051) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 4.94 4% 5.36 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 4.17 3% 4.11 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 120G 120GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 97GB free Firmware: V3.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 96 52 82 59 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 219 Write 165 Mixed 158 SusWrite 84.9 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 10.8 61% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 11.1 20% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 39%
Ir-ssdpr -S25A-120 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 44 39 70 34 36 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.8% Very poor	Read 13.8 Write 111 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 43.6 10% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 12.9 32% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 30 DQ Mixed 12.3 13% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team--Elite-133300 GY1600D364L9/2G000 6GB 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.9% Poor	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback