ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Laptop 15-db0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84AE
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '20 at 03:32
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 193 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 339 36% 289 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 84AE) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Lighting 12.5 Reflection 12 Parallax 16.1 10% 13.5 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 16.4 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 574GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 103 102 105 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 104 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 149% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 72%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 500GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 465GB free, PID 5000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 34 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 37.9 Write 31.4 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 33.6 45% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 13.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	298x
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples	287x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 28%, 7,071 samples	171x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	293x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	286x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	171x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	44x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	43x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	37x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	176x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	88x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback