MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 01:09
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 48.1
41% 57 Pts
4-Core 77.9
8-Core 55.1
10% 66.5 Pts
64-Core 42.5
3% 42.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
MSI(1462 7721) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2801.1002
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.76 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
472GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 75 105 110 92 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 165
Write 130
Mixed 30
SusWrite 102
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 107%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 317a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.6 10 10 10 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 12.2
Mixed 5
SusWrite 9.9
16% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
41% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01L3L84GB52852816 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback