Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory5.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111030
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '20 at 05:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5507
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 114
43% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 451
40% 337 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 84.8
33% 63.7 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 54.4
51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500G 500GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 213 213 211 212 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 238
Write 209
Mixed 211
SusWrite 213
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 16.8
66% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 52.1
62% 107 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10x1GB
10 of 12 slots used
10GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback