Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S761

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK S761  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB22E
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 10:44
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 48
2-Core 108
49% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 160
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 1.62
2% 7.44 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
3% 3.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB160G4 160GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D2010355
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 171 161 140 124 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 284
Write 188
Mixed 193
SusWrite 144
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 19.7
70% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 218
169% 235 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 802C 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK S761 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S761

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback