Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 22:42
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 963
86% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,345
83% 1,345 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 79.3
51% 69.3 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 55.4
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 689 356 360 358 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 1,190
Mixed 1208
SusWrite 552
239% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 68
229% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 816
609% 806 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 193%
Great: 223%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
38GB free
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 101 151 159 155 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 460
Write 373
Mixed 293
SusWrite 176
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 20.1
83% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 44.5
48% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 93 94 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 89.1
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 92.5
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 15 19 25 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 11.8
Write 17
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 19.8
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 63%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
351GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 14 18 15 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 13.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 16.4
17% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 30.3
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback