Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics0.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 09:27
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 518
69% 517 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Matrox M9148 LP PCIe x16
Device(102B 2240) 1GB
Driver: MxMUm64.dll Ver. 2.5.0.227
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.12% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.23 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.04
0% 0.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.12%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KH480HAHQ-00005 480GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXM7404Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 480 489 491 494 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 494
Mixed 460
SusWrite 487
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 65.5
226% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 137%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback