Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '20 at 22:36
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 128 2-Core 283 89% 165 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 824 80% 659 Pts	64-Core 995 62% 995 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 115 Parallax 106 89% 110 fps	MRender 95.5 Gravity 97.1 Splatting 99.4 80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 481 Write 474 Mixed 352 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 50 166% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 339 262% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 109GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,445 Write 1,468 Mixed 1,025 362% 1,646 MB/s	4K Read 58.8 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 84.8 287% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 975 DQ Write 1,144 DQ Mixed 1,000 770% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 423GB free Firmware: CC46 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 16.4 Write 46.4 Mixed 17.4 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 29.7 Write 49.2 Mixed 11.4 22% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 182% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 110%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 383GB free Firmware: 2BA3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 89.2 Write 97.7 Mixed 53.6 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G1 80GB 418 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 73GB free Firmware: 0000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 63.4 Write 60.4 Mixed 36.7 40% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 35%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB 621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 345GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 34.4 Write 35 Mixed 27.9 41% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 4,486 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 9GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 14.9 Write 5 Mixed 2.7 7% 7.53 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.8% Excellent	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 36.4 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 32.6 76% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $179Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $754

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)