Asus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 22:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 99
2-Core 182
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 394
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 129
Parallax 110
98% 120 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 118
Splatting 98.9
85% 104 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 212 216 200 195 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 330
Write 358
Mixed 197
SusWrite 206
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 17.4
70% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 132
115% 170 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 99%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
931GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 688 701 674 716 685 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,119
Write 1045
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 686
218% 969 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 43.7
150% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 732
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 684
512% 682 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 163%
Great: 347%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 7TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 59 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 89.5
Write 71
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 60.1
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 103%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 90 91 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 97
Write 92.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 90.4
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 62%
Generic MassStorageClass 125GB
92GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 66 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 68.2
91% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.7
243% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE/GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback