Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime63.4 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 07:24
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$199
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 61
2-Core 106
54% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 306
30% 246 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Matrox M9140 LP PCIe x16
Device(102B 2080) 512MB
Driver: MxMUm64.dll Ver. 2.4.3.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.03
0% 0.16 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 0
Splatting 0
0% 0 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.09%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$169
90GB free
Firmware: 335t
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 107 150 136 142 142 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 169
Write 150
Mixed 152
SusWrite 133
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 23.2
77% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 32.7
33% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$33
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 87 87 80 89 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 53
SusWrite 82.8
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 76%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
592GB free, PID 0184
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 100 104 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 104
Write 111
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 106
128% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 51%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
428GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 1TB
392GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 19.7
35% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 14.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback