Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 01:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 243
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 515
67% 506 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 244 165 101 59 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.6% Good
Read 185
Write 97.2
Mixed 143
SusWrite 168
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 29.9
117% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 50.4
80% 152 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$19
8GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 41.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 36.9
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 36%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
526GB free
Firmware: JE4OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 83.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 76.8
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSE.16FAR 859B BLS8G4D240FSC.16FARG 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 27.3
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback