DNS W9x0LU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.02%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDNS W9x0LU  (all builds)
MotherboardDNS W9x0LU
Memory2.3 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Memory 15.2
1-Core 3.5
2-Core 5.2
6% 7.95 Pts
4-Core 5.7
8-Core 7.4
1% 6.55 Pts
64-Core 7.7
0% 7.7 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Clevo(1558 0945) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 2.44
0% 1.68 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 53 58 77 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 21.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 63.3
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKH400SO51208-1600 MXIC 25L/U Series 37GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.5 GB/s
Latency 358
11% 358 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W9x0LU Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: DNS W9x0LU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback