Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 263 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 672 68% 549 Pts	64-Core 768 48% 768 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 90%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg50pnv2t04 NVMe TOSHIBA 2048GB 1,462 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 684GB free (System drive) Firmware: AFDA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 209 193 185 177 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 837 Write 255 Mixed 279 SusWrite 191 85% 390 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 29.9 112% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 871 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 340 315% 502 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GB 3,590 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 26.9 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,897x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 25%, 10,407 samples	1,594x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	57x

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	534x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	467x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	463x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 18,486 samples	776x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	492x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 11,016 samples	390x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16