HP hp workstation xw8200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP hp workstation xw8200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory3 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 21:42
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 28
2-Core 56.4
32% 47 Pts
4-Core 55.1
8-Core 55.8
7% 55.4 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X600 Series
Asus(1043 0022) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.38
0% 0.33 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 64 81 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 82.8
Write 83.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 75.6
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
512, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw8200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback