Gigabyte GA-890XA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-890XA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 21:32
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B99
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 119
58% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 232
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.7
14% 19.3 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20.7
15% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 412 417 422 421 415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 444
Mixed 393
SusWrite 412
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 39.6
132% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 203
158% 217 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
384GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 160 165 179 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 155
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 172
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-890XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890XA-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback