Asus X99-E

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-E (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 95.5 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 221 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 718 72% 585 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2552 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 153 Parallax 124 124% 143 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 131 Splatting 109 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB 16,899 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 46 33 25 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 80.2 Write 290 Mixed 47 SusWrite 59.8 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 25 74% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 87.5 DQ Mixed 23.6 38% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 311GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 98 99 98 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 151 Write 109 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 97.9 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GB 5,197 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80% Excellent	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 25.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	273x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	92x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	101x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16