Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 190
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 473
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
XFX(1682 3192) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 5.81
6% 6.61 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 5.7
5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 422 421 422 415 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 414
Mixed 318
SusWrite 418
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 36.7
128% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 286
238% 342 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Seagate USB 2TB
800GB free, PID a0a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 121 122 118 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 120
153% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback